The nature of electoral politics is that towards the end of
an electoral cycle all thoughts turn towards the next opportunity for victory
or defeat. This is particularly true now that we have a fixed term for
parliamentary elections. It was upon this line of thought that I decided to
investigate whether my twitter friend @DorsetRachel had been selected as a
Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for West Dorset. Rachelcurrently serves
as a councillor for part of Weymouth, which is in the neighbouring constituency of South Dorset. I was pleased to find out that she has
been selected, but then rather dismayed to find out that West Dorset has never
even come close to having a Labour MP. In fact West Dorset has had only 6
different MPs since 1885 and all of them Conservative.
This may not be situation peculiar to this part of England,
but causes me more sorrow in the knowledge that this constituency contains the
village of Tolpuddle. The village made
famous for the 6 martyrs who, 180 years ago this March, were sentenced to
transportation for the crime of making an oath. Their real crime, in the eyes
of the landowners, was in forming a union to organise agricultural labourers.
Life in southern England was harsh then, the Enclosure Acts
meant that rural people no longer had access to fields to grow their own food
and instead had to buy food on the open market. An economic depression in the
1830s led to rural unemployment and more pressure on the Poor Law System.
Technological innovation meant that the labourers had just had their pay
reduced for a third time, from 10s a week down to 6s a week, but prices for
food began to rise as London and the industrial north prospered. The labourers
were starving as costs outstripped their income.
Poverty data for 2012 shows that there are still
many people in Dorset who rely on the support of their community to
survive. One fifth of people in Weymouth
and Portland live in houses that receive housing benefit, a figure that rises
to 28.6% when you consider only those under the age 20. The adjacent West Dorset has seen
the biggest proportional increase since 2011 and now almost one in five people
aged under 20 live in households reliant on benefit.
Dorset, like many other parts of Great Britain, is grossly
unequal. Pockets of mass deprivation reside cheek by jowl with the second-homes
of affluent city-dwellers and the estates of the land-owning elite. The balance
of income and opportunity is barely indiscernible from the days of Thomas Hardy. Bridport, Weymouth, Portland and Somerford are
among the 20%
most deprived areas in the UK and appear like islands on the map
of multiple deprivations with seas of affluence around them. The maps for
income, employment, education and skills, health and disability, IDACI and crime
all follow a similar pattern. There are two maps, however, that paint a
different picture.
These are the Living Environment Domain and Barriers to
Housing and Services Domain. Both of
these are related to the quality of and access to housing and local services.
The reasons that these barriers exist are many. One
explanation is the presence of second homes in the county that artificially
increases the notional value of housing (a problem shared with Devon, Cornwall
and Cumbria, among others). The main barrier to service provision is the
geography of the county, a problem very different from those faced by cities. The
relatively large proportion of retired people in both West and East Dorset also
provides a different challenge. A problem that is shared with many other areas
is the relative low pay received by peoples working within Dorset. The relative
proportion of socio-economic
groups within the county is broadly similar to the national average, however the
median pay of a worker in
Weymouth is less than 82% that of the national figure. Furthermore although the
median pay of a worker in West Dorset is 31% higher than those in, for example,
West
Yorkshire, the price of housing
is approximately 74% greater. I think it is also interesting to note the large
disparity between the median pay of those living in East Dorset, a largely
affluent area, and those who only work in East Dorset. An issue that those who
live in larger urban areas will recognise, particularly London where the
workers are being forced to travel greater distances to get to their place of
work from places where they can afford to live.
In both 1834 and 2014 the population of rural counties have
faced recession and falling wages; they have had limited opportunity to improve
their own lot and are instead reliant on other agencies or relocation to
provide subsistence. It is important to
note that these deprivation figures are from 2010. They were therefore recorded
after 13 years of a Labour government that did much to help many, but did not
do enough for some. I would hope, however, that were the electorate to return a
Labour government in 2015 that next time around they would pay far more
attention to solving the problems that have afflicted counties like Dorset and
Lincolnshire for centuries.
Politics within Dorset, and much of the south of England,
has been dominated by the Conservative Party or its forebears for centuries, a
dominance that has resulted in the maintenance of the status quo. A county run by
and for the interests of the wealthy and ignoring the interests of the young
and disadvantaged. I hope that the next Labour government can deliver on their
ambitious housing and infrastructure programme but the real leveller would be a
land value tax. To make a difference to the quality of living environments and
to remove barriers to housing and services we need to find a more progressive
way of raising tax. The ownership of land
within Dorset is emblematic of land ownership within the UK. A small
minority of people own vast swathes of the countryside, some of them have even
been Conservative
ministers and some of them still are. For people living in these villages they are
trapped in a feudal lifestyle, unchanged for centuries, they work on the land,
are paid a pittance and rely on the land-owner for accommodation. This
inequality is not as visible as in the major cities, but it is just as
important.
If Labour is to win a majority in the next election then I
think they will have to win some seats in southern England (that are outside
London). Peter Kellner, president of YouGov, has written that
Labour cannot simply rely on the Conservatives losing the election, we need to
win it. Jim Knight recognises this and has written about the need to deliver on
the politics
of the periphery and the need for Labour to gain seats in the coast and
countryside. The key to this will be policies that improve access to housing
and local services. This could be rural bus services, rural GPs and dentists
and more and better housing.
Over the last 180 years the power of trade unions has ebbed
and flowed but one thing remains certain, the power of capital over labour has
never been truly challenged. To win the next election Labour will have to win
seats in the countryside. Winning in South Dorset, the constituency that Jim
Knight represented until 2010, would be a severe blow to the Conservatives. I
would also like Labour to embrace the history of the union link and try to win
what would be a significant victory in West Dorset, the home of the Tolpuddle
martyrs and the seat of Oliver Letwin MP.
When the six men of Tolpuddle were sentenced to
transportation there was a mass outcry and a campaign for their release was
organised by the Grand National Consolidated Trades Union. A march was held in
April 1834 with over 100,000 people attending and over the next few months petitions
were sent to parliament with over 800,000 signatures. In 1835 all six of the
men were granted a conditional pardon, although they turned it down and
continued the fight. The next year, on 14th March 1836, the government agreed that
all the men should have a full and free pardon. Trade unions had won and
survived their first big challenge. The six farm workers from Tolpuddle were on
their way home as free men. This is proof, were it needed that by the strength
of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone. By creating a
coalition of coast, country and city we can create for each of us the means to
realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth
and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was amended on the 10th July to state that Weymouth and Portland are in the South Dorset Constituency, not West Dorset, as the original wording stated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was amended on the 10th July to state that Weymouth and Portland are in the South Dorset Constituency, not West Dorset, as the original wording stated.
No comments:
Post a Comment